
Shown below is a cylinder shaped wine barrel.

Fig. 1
From Fig. 1, we see that
and so,
Kepler’s “Wine Barrel Problem” can be stated as:
If is fixed, what value of
gives the largest volume of
?

Kepler conducted extensive numerical studies on this problem. However, it was solved analytically only after the invention of calculus.
In the spring of 2012, while carrying out a research on solving maximization/minimization problems, I discovered the following theorem:
Theorem-1. For positive quantities and positive rational quantities
, if
is a constant, then
attains its maximum if
.
By applying Theorem-1, the “Wine Barrel Problem” can be solved analytically without calculus at all. It is as follows:
Rewrite (2) as
Since
and
, a constant,
by Theorem-1, when
or
(see (3)) attains its maximum.
Solving (4) for positive , we have
Discovered from the same research is another theorem for solving minimization problem without calculus:
Theorem-2. For positive quantities and positive rational quantities
, if
is a constant, then
attains its minimum if
.
Let’s look at an example:
Problem: Find the minimum value of for
.
Since for and
, a constant,
by Theorem-2, when
attains its minimum.
Solving (5) for yields
.
Therefore, at attains its minimum value
(see Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
Nonetheless, neither Theorem-1 nor Theorem-2 is a silver bullet for solving max/min problems without calculus. For example,
Problem: Find the minimum value of for
.
Theorem-2 is not applicable here (see Exercise-1). To solve this problem, we proceed as follows:
From , we have
and so,
.
That is,
.
Or,
i.e.
.
Since ,
,
with the “=” sign in “” holds at
.
Therefore, attains its minimum -54 at
(see FIg. 3).

Fig. 3
Exercise-1 Explain why Theorem-2 is not applicable to finding the minimum of for
.