Let us turn our attention to the numerical calculation of logarithm, introduced in my previous post “Introducing Lady L“.
An example of naively compute
, based solely on its definition is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
However, a more explicit expression is better suited for this purpose.

Fig. 2
From Fig.2, geometrical Interpretation of
as the shaded area reveals that


,
i.e.,

Inserting into (1) the well known result
,
we obtain



.
Let
,
we have
.
If
,

otherwise (
.
Therefore, either

or
.
Since
,

and

We conclude that
.
As a consequence,



,
i.e.,

(2) offers a means for finding the numerical values of logarithm. However, its range is limited to the value of
between 0 and 2, since
.
To overcome this limitation, we proceed as follows:
. By (2),

i.e.,

Subtracting (3) from (2) and using the fact that
, we have


.
i.e.,

Solving equation
where
,
we find
.
Since this solution can be expressed as

or
.
It shows that for any
,
. Therefore, (4) can be used to obtain the logarithm of any positive number. For example, to obtain
, we solve
first and then compute a partial sum of (4) with sufficient large number of terms (see Fig. 3)

Fig. 3